You’re listening to the Every day Roundup right here as a part of the Actuality C Podcast. I’m your host actuality. Steve, thanks all for tuning in on this Friday as we head into the weekend. We’re gonna have just a little bit look again at yesterday’s podcast briefly with Rachel Juarez. Additionally received some extra survivor discuss.
David does his submit tribal council exit interview with Dalton Ross and he mentioned one thing that got here up on the merchants this season, and I nonetheless have the identical take as I did again then. Pilot, Pete goes to be on a brand new actuality present that’s not Bachelor in Paradise and just a little bit extra on Jax as a result of I received an e mail primarily based on what I mentioned about Jax yesterday and I wanna learn it to you and reply to this particular person and we might get to all that momentarily.
So yesterday, podcast quantity 4 40 with Rachel Juarez. I do know lots of you listened to it and lots of you actually appreciated it and. She actually broke it down in all probability extra. I imply, I assume that’s a matter of opinion, however I assumed yesterday’s look by her was so good, and to reply the questions that she did in the way in which that she did, those that you just guys despatched in.
I assumed was very, very informative. All of her stuff about Jerris within the first 30, 35 minutes of the podcast was wonderful, and I actually do assume that. Look, I’ve not heard from Ingris outdoors of the day earlier than he despatched out these tweets to say he was submitting for reconsideration as a result of after his debate with Rachel, he thought she was fully nuts and that is the way in which he wanted to go.
And then you definitely heard what Rachel’s take is her principle is that he realized throughout that debate that he didn’t increase a very powerful factor that he wanted to lift in his enchantment, which was breaking down. The allocation of charges, and he or she feels that he used that debate, however as a result of he may by no means, and this isn’t being hyperbole right here, I don’t assume this man will ever give credit score to a girl.
I don’t assume he’ll ever hearken to a girl who places him in his place. I imply, you return and watch that debate or hearken to that debate. Along with her, it was type of like. I type of liken it to after I was on Nick’s podcast as a result of within the second after I was recording with Nick, it didn’t come throughout as as unhealthy because it did as soon as it aired.
As soon as I listened to it, like after I was achieved recording that, I used to be like, yeah, there have been some issues that I might’ve appreciated to have gotten out and I felt like Nick interrupted me a pair occasions, however. It wasn’t till I listened to it again after which when each single response to that was principally destroying Nick for a way he carried out the interview.
After which I did discover out some issues after the interview that actually set me off about him. However after I did, simply taking the interview at face worth and taking it. Simply naked bones, simply the interview itself. Once I listened to it again, I used to be like, man, that was worse than I bear in mind it. And that’s the identical method I really feel in regards to the Rachel and Ingris debate.
Like I knew it was unhealthy within the second. Hell, I used to be texting individuals. There have been a pair texts that I despatched out throughout that. I don’t know for those who see me on display screen, you in all probability do, however I used to be identical to, wow, this isn’t going how I assumed it might. That was one of many texts I bear in mind sending out. However it wasn’t till I watched it again that I spotted, oh my gosh, he’s being so dismissive of her so defensive.
She’s actually questioning him. Questioning him on sure issues, and he’s beating across the bush, not answering it straight, after which getting flustered and blaming it on her and blaming it on. We have to transfer on. We have to get to a different subject. It’s like we had two hours and 20 minutes. The rationale we wanted to maneuver on.
It’s since you gave 5 and 10 minute solutions, which once more, I ought to have stepped in just a little bit earlier as a result of on lots of these 5 or 10 minute solutions, it didn’t have to be that lengthy. He simply went off on tangents and he would simply convey up a brand new level and a brand new level, and a brand new level. And also you heard me say to Rachel yesterday, and he or she’s identical to, yeah, I, he’s precisely in that interview, the way in which he presents himself on his weblog, on his tweets, and on his YouTube channel.
That is the way in which he’s. And God forbid anyone tells him he’s mistaken and says, I don’t agree with you. It’s like he didn’t agree together with her. So in his thoughts she’s completely mistaken. But when she didn’t disagree with him, if she didn’t, if she disagreed with him, she’s mistaken nonetheless like nothing, she mentioned. And I, and we went into that.
Each saying, look, you’re not gonna change his thoughts. He was by no means gonna change her thoughts and he or she was by no means gonna change his. However he didn’t current any arguments throughout that debate the place she might be like, what, David? That’s a great level. I see what you’re saying there. Now she would’ve fortunately achieved that.
She instructed me she would’ve achieved that. She goes, he didn’t current something. He’s not a great debater. What he’s good at is being a grasp debater. Certain to tip your waitress, however when she had nice factors, had stuff printed out, like I mentioned within the podcast yesterday, I don’t assume that David Ingris really thought that Rachel learn the case.
I believe he thought that she was in all probability somebody like Dave Neil, , not a lawyer, and simply appreciated speaking in regards to the case. I don’t assume he realized she went by each single case that he cited in his enchantment, so she got here ready. You hearken to that podcast, both yesterday’s or the controversy podcast between them who sounded extra ready, to not point out him getting flustered, him making faces.
Who stayed calm and picked up with their arguments and who did what he did, and fly off the deal with and get defensive and say, you need a cookie, and say, can we transfer on? I assume we’ll simply conform to disagree each time. He mentioned, let’s conform to disagree on this. It was as a result of she introduced up a degree that was higher than his.
It’s an interesting, fascinating factor. I can’t see us ever doing that once more, simply because he’s by no means going to hear. Sure, you possibly can say let him present his ass once more, however. I, I believe two hours and 20 minutes of him is sufficient. I don’t assume that he would hearken to me if I mentioned, David, if I convey you on once more and we do that, you’re sticking to my parameters.
If I step in, it’s not as a result of I simply wish to interrupt you. It’s since you’re giving these lengthy ass solutions which can be going nowhere and also you’re not answering the precise query. And once more, the most important level to with to, to David Ingris. Rachel mentioned it yesterday, I’ve mentioned it for months. If he’s not going to ever hear or have an open ear to the issues that the JFC discovered and Dave Neil discovered pre David Ingris becoming a member of the case, we’re by no means getting wherever with him.
He doesn’t wanna hearken to it, however as Rachel mentioned yesterday, that’s superb. For those who wanna solely discuss all the pieces that. You already know from whenever you took over, that’s superb, however then you may’t in the identical breath, flip proper round and name Mike Marni and Greg Gillespie. Dangerous guys and horrible people. You don’t know something that they’d achieved outdoors of what Laura instructed you.
You haven’t seen any of the proof ’trigger you haven’t learn any of it. So you may’t have it each methods in that exact state of affairs. However I hope you guys loved that yesterday. I do know I did actual rapidly on Survivor. I didn’t even convey this up final week, although lots of you introduced it as much as me as a result of it was turned a web based factor.
When Eva received the benefit on the meals problem, on the reward problem, we didn’t see, a minimum of, I don’t bear in mind seeing, , they put the scroll in her meals, however. I missed it through the episode, or this actually got here out throughout an image. After the episode, every particular person had a nameplate the place they had been supposed to take a seat.
So it’s just like the present particularly planted it for Eva to seek out the benefit as a result of if Eva needed to sit on this explicit spot as a result of it mentioned Eva on a plate, on a, on a placard, after which it had everybody else’s identify the place they had been supposed to take a seat, and the meals and the scroll was in her meals. How would, that doesn’t appear honest, .
They ha have they addressed that publicly? Has Jeff talked about it on his podcast? I don’t know. However sure, we all know that they’ve hidden scrolls in meals earlier than, however it appeared like anybody can sit down and it simply was a random luck for those who occur to take a seat subsequent to the meals that had the scroll in it. This, they had been instructed the place to take a seat primarily based on the identify plates.
So, to see if that comes up afterward, if it’s addressed post-season. As soon as the season is over and folks begin asking her questions or different individuals questions they usually go on podcasts and stuff, as a result of that’s, that appears to be an unfair benefit. David did his exit interview with Dalton Ross on ew.com final evening, and as I discussed within the open, he mentioned one thing that occurred on merchants this summer time and it occurred once more.
He claims that Joe swore on his children that he would by no means write David’s identify down. So some individuals say that, oh my gosh, that’s such a horrible factor to do. However identical to when Danielle did it on merchants, I’m like, can we cease in a recreation the place you’re speculated to outwit, outplay, outlast, manipulate the video games for 1,000,000 {dollars}?
Effectively, we all know Survivor is, we all know merchants is for like 13 cents, however in a recreation like Survivor, the sport says Outwit, outplay, outlast. Can we cease making it such an enormous deal when individuals swear on their children? As a result of nothing’s gonna occur to the children. It, it, it’s, it’s simply phrases. It doesn’t imply something. I don’t lose any type of respect for Joe as a result of he mentioned that he’s enjoying a recreation.
They’re all enjoying a recreation. You gotta do what you gotta do to win. Johnny Fairplay lied about his grandma being useless. Everyone again within the day thought that was the funniest factor ever. However but for those who say, oh, I swear on my children, I received’t vote for you, man, you bought my phrase in a recreation like this. No. In each in daily exercise, in case you have somebody at work that you just wish to inform a secret to or you may have a narrative you wish to inform, please don’t share that.
Oh no. I promise I received’t. I swear to my children. I believe that’s completely different. In a recreation the place cash’s on the road and also you’re speculated to lie and outwit and outplay and outlast. I believe phrases like which can be hole. I don’t assume it issues, and I don’t, I don’t fault anybody for saying it, and if persons are nonetheless gonna fall for it.
Now that we’ve seen on two reveals that aired in the identical 9 month interval, six month interval, two reveals the place anyone swore on their children after which went again on their phrase. I might assume going ahead, for those who’re anyone that that occurs to in a recreation like this, possibly you don’t imagine them anymore.
That’s all I’m saying.
